Valentino vs Mario Valentino: One Name, Two Companies
The word Valentino appears on handbags from two different Italian companies, they are not related, and the confusion is old enough to have generated its own case law. The first is the Roman couture house founded in 1960; the other is a Naples leather goods and footwear house founded in 1952. Each of them is legitimate, both hold documented rights to the name in their own way, and the boundary between them was drawn by a private contract in 1979 rather than by a judge. This piece explains who each company is, what the agreement requires of each side, what the recent litigation covered and how it ended, and how a shopper can tell within seconds which company made a given bag. It is a trademark story rather than an accusation against either side, and nothing below should be read as a finding of wrongdoing. Read it once and you will never misread a listing again.
Two cities, two houses, two companies
Valentino S.p.A. is the Roman house founded in 1960 by Valentino Garavani and Giancarlo Giammetti, with its first atelier on Via Condotti. The ownership story has nothing to do with the founder: the founder sold the business in 1998, Mayhoola for Investments took control in 2012 for around 700 million euros, and Kering acquired thirty per cent in July 2023, intending to buy the company outright by 2028. Valentino Garavani retired from design work in 2007, showed a final couture collection in January 2008 and valentino garavani shoulder bag died on 19 January 2026, aged 93, so none of the current bag collection is his design. Mario Valentino S.p.A. is a different business altogether, founded in Naples in 1952 by a man of that name, and still based there, and it is a leather goods and footwear house rather than a couture maison. Its bags are sold as Valentino by Mario Valentino, and its claims to have invented the stiletto heel and the women’s moccasin are self-description rather than verified fact.
The 1979 contract that carved up the name
Signed in 1979, a coexistence agreement laid down which marks each side could use on which goods, and it remains the document everything else refers back to. Under its terms, Mario Valentino may use Mario Valentino, M. Valentino, Valentino, MV or V on the exterior, on condition that the full name appears inside the item and on its packaging. That same agreement prevents the company from using V and Valentino together on leather goods. Running the other way, Valentino S.p.A. is contractually obliged to use GARAVANI in addition to VALENTINO on its leather goods and in the advertising for them. There is a distinct United States angle as well: Mario Valentino’s stated position is that it has held the American trademark Valentino for handbags and leather goods since 26 April 1971, and that senior-rights claim is corroborated in legal reporting.
The reason one company must add GARAVANI
On a Roman-house bag, the surname on the interior tag is there by contract, not by design preference. On account of the way the 1979 agreement divided the marks, and because of the senior US rights position on handbags, Valentino S.p.A. does not sell its leather goods under the single word Valentino. It is the addition of GARAVANI that keeps the mark distinguishable, and that is why VALENTINO GARAVANI shows up in capitals on the tag and in bag advertising. Inside the Roman house the same wording doubles as a naming convention: Valentino Garavani covers accessories, while Valentino and Maison Valentino are used for ready-to-wear. That is one company applying one set of standards, not a lower tier and a higher one. In practical terms, this yields the single most useful fact in the whole subject: a bag from the couture house says GARAVANI, and a bag that reads only Valentino outside and Mario Valentino inside is a genuine Mario Valentino, a different company selling at a different price point.
The lawsuit filed in 2019, and its ending
In July 2019 Valentino S.p.A. brought suit against Mario Valentino in the US District Court for the Central District of California, docketed 2:19-cv-6306. Mario Valentino’s counterclaims were dismissed in April 2021. On 14 June 2024 the case itself was settled and dismissed without prejudice, and the terms were never disclosed. Dismissal without prejudice matters, since it leaves either side free to raise the matter again. Reporting also indicates that more than ten proceedings, including arbitrations, remained live in Italy, so the 2024 dismissal ended one American case rather than the whole disagreement. The claims pleaded in the action were:
- Alleged false advertising and unfair competition.
- Alleged breach of the 1979 coexistence agreement.
- Handbags claimed to imitate the couture house’s designs.
- A claim of unauthorised use of the V mark on leather goods.
Reporting places the escalation of the dispute from 2017 onward, when handbag advertising began foregrounding the word VALENTINO on its own. Because the case settled, none of the claims was tested to judgment, and no finding of wrongdoing was made against either company.
A separate case, filed in 2022
A separate action ran in the opposite direction and involved a third party. Mario Valentino S.p.A. filed suit against Fashionphile Group LLC in the Southern District of New York in October 2022, under docket 1:22-cv-08984. The complaint alleged that around four hundred handbags had been listed on the resale platform as VALENTINO when they were in fact goods of Valentino S.p.A. That case’s outcome is not verified here, and it should not be reported as settled in either direction. The naming problem does not stop at the two companies: it reaches resale platforms, marketplace listings and anyone who describes a bag with a single word. For a buyer, the lesson is that a listing title is the least reliable part of any resale page.
Which shelves each brand actually reaches
The two companies reach shoppers through different channels, which resolves much of the confusion. The Roman house sells directly through its own webstore and boutiques and through a defined set of authorised retailers including Neiman Marcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Saks Fifth Avenue, Nordstrom, Mytheresa, Net-a-Porter, Farfetch, Selfridges, Harrods and Tessabit. Its one legitimate off-price channel is THE OUTNET, the off-price arm of Net-a-Porter, though how deep the discounting goes there is not something to state with confidence. It is the Naples company’s bags that appear on the shelves of American off-price chains, something verifiable from those retailers’ own brand filter pages. That is why a Valentino bag sale at an off-price chain is seldom what a shopper looking for the couture house actually means. Neither situation involves anything improper: these are two separate companies selling their own goods through their own distribution. Observed 2026 market prices for the couture house’s leather goods ran from about $650 for a VLogo Signature clutch in grainy calfskin to $7,900 for an embroidered Panthea, all made in Italy, with Rebag’s data putting average resale retention for the house near 41 per cent.
| Point of comparison | Valentino S.p.A. | Mario Valentino S.p.A. |
|---|---|---|
| Origin | Rome, 1960 | Naples, 1952 |
| Name used on bags | Valentino Garavani | Valentino by Mario Valentino |
| What the inside says | VALENTINO, GARAVANI, MADE IN ITALY | Mario Valentino inside the item and on the packaging |
| Usual channels | Own boutiques, Saks Fifth Avenue, Neiman Marcus, Mytheresa, Farfetch | Off-price chains: Nordstrom Rack, Saks OFF 5TH, TJ Maxx |
Thirty seconds to tell them apart
Start with the inside of the bag, not the outside. The interior tag of a couture-house bag carries VALENTINO and GARAVANI in capitals along with MADE IN ITALY, sewn down on all four sides, with consistent font weight and evenly pressed stamping. A serial number is usually found on a tag inside an interior pocket, but not always: older pieces may carry none, and its absence on its own proves nothing. These bags carry no date-code system at all, meaning any guide offering to decode a manufacturing date from the digits is describing something that does not exist. Exterior reading only Valentino, interior reading Mario Valentino: that is a genuine Naples-made bag from the other company. The trap runs both ways: a genuine Mario Valentino bag will fail a Garavani checklist and still be completely authentic, so work out which company made the bag before asking whether it is real.
What this means for shopping
Neither of these companies is the counterfeit, and framing this as fake against real misses what is happening. If you want the Roman house, search for Valentino Garavani rather than Valentino alone, and read the tag before the price. If the Naples company’s leather goods suit you, buy them with your eyes open and enjoy the lower price, which reflects a different business, not a compromised version of the same one. Where it goes wrong is in resale listings and third-party marketplaces that describe both with one word, precisely the territory covered by the 2022 case. A pre-owned Valentino bag described only as Valentino needs clear photographs of the interior tag before any money changes hands. Ask for those photographs, and a decades-old tangle turns into a two-second check.
